Violations.si
Four things to build on the record of what went wrong, in six parts.
Safety needs a shared record.
Medicine has its adverse-event reports and aviation its crash investigations. Superintelligence has no shared record of failures yet, and every lab rediscovers the same mistakes. For a startup, “violations” is the word regulators and reporters already use, which makes it the natural name for the register and the business around it.
Every failure, logged the same way.
A non-profit runs the public register: the system, the failure, the harm, the fix. Labs submit their own cases.
Checking systems against the rules.
An audit company tests deployed systems for policy violations and gives each client a report a regulator will accept.
Reporting on SI failures.
A specialist newsroom covers the incidents, the lawsuits and the fixes, and builds a readership among the people who must avoid them.
Catching violations as they happen.
A startup sells a monitor that flags when a deployed model breaks its own rules, before anyone is harmed.
This name is waiting for its builder.
Everyone above is made up. The name is real, and it is for sale.
Those are only the uses we can picture. Someone who is a real innovator, a creative destroyer in Joseph Schumpeter’s sense, will see in this name something nobody has imagined yet, and build that instead.
It is priced on enquiry, with a reply inside one business day. Payment goes through independent escrow, and the name is pushed to your registrar, usually within 24 hours.
The end.
